Evaluation of Knowledge Transfer
No one particular knowledge transfer technique has been shown to be necessarily more cost effective than another [Grimshaw, et al., 2006), but having stakeholders invested in OHS research with researchers is well-supported as an effective technique. Hence, this is the major technique of knowledge transfer that is utilized by CRE-MSD.
CRE-MSD is involved in a number of studies to evaluate the effectiveness of stakeholder networks as a knowledge transfer and exchange strategy to facilitate the use of OHS research evidence. These are ongoing in the construction, transportation and electrical utilities sector.
It is difficult to evaluate networks especially for their ability to enhance the instrumental use of research knowledge (Nutley, Walter & Davies, 2007). That being said, a number of approaches can be adopted, including:
- system level analysis of shifts in attitudes, awareness and decision-making processes;
- network level analysis that will measure the network’s sustainability and ability to expand its collaborations; and
- individual level analysis of satisfaction, the effectiveness of the group processes, and self-assessment of growth in personal effectiveness.
A KT evaluation includes data collection to measure such things as an increase in awareness, investment and commitment to OHS research findings, an increase in the motivation to use OHS research evidence, the involvement of the members of the networks in OHS research, the investment of workplace parties and clinicians in using the findings of research, and the impact on the researchers who interact with the networks and align their research to meet the needs of the network members.